I was recently invited to speak at Ottawa’s Social Media Breakfast. The organizers, Simon Chen, Rob Lane and Ryan Anderson, asked me specifically to bring a sociologist’s understanding to social media. Below is my presentation. For the full version, with the notes, visit the full slideshare version.
My essential argument for the presentation was that we don’t have enough deep understanding of “the social” in social media. Social media gurus abound these days, but too few of them actually understand social theory. Sociologists have been thinking about and researching social interactions for over a century. Just because we are now using the Web doesn’t mean those essential insights are no longer valid. Quite, the contrary, I argue. Social theory is even more relevant today because it coheres and synthesizes design and marketing research. We need social theory to provide some weight, some shape to what we learn about social media use.
As an aside, I notice “social business” is an emerging buzz word. All business is social. Those who argue “social business” is new are missing the point; we have only just begun to realize social interaction is fundamental to business, in part because we have begun to engage in empathetic research projects such as ethnography. When you do quantitative surveys, for example, it’s incredibly easy to dismiss the real impact of your business policies on your customers or employees. But when you hang out with your employees and hear candid feedback about how you’ve organized your business processes, it’s impossible to ignore the social impact (Undercover Boss is a great example of this phenomenon). “Social business,” then, is the effect of “taking on the role of the other” in your employee or customer research. It is not new.
But back to social media. I offer two social theories: social capital (Bourdieu) and dramaturgical theory (Goffman) to explain how we interact both on and off-line. Social networks are a source of wealth, says Bourdieu. Social interaction is a well-crafted play, says Goffman. I apply these theories to well executed, and not-so-well executed social media experiences.
Bourdieu understood our social networks to be a source of wealth. It’s what helps the rich get richer, he argued. Rich people know other people who can help them make more money or to keep the money they have. Sociologist Mark Granovetter found that in fact, it is the “weak ties” we have with our acquaintances that gets us jobs, for example. “Strong ties” with friends and family may enrich us spiritually but provide us fewer job opportunities.
Goffman had another framework for understanding social interaction: the theatre. Goffman believed social actors play roles when they interact. We have scripts, a wardrobe, a set, make-up, and a cast (or “team” as he called it). Embarrassment happens when the script slips. Imagine you must be both a manager, a father, a school buddy, and a cousin all at the same time. Embarrassing! This is what online social networks do to us everyday: they force us to play multiple roles at the same time. Good social media allows “audience segregation,” which lets us select which role to play when.
In the Q&A afterward, I mentioned a few pieces of social research that would help people understand social theory. The first is
McMillan, S. and M. Morrison (2006). “Coming of Age With The Internet: A Qualitative Exploration of How The Internet Has Become An Integral Part of Young People’s Lives.” New Media and Society 8(1): 73-95.
The second that is a wealth of information about social networking and online life:
Wellman, B. and C. Haythornwait, Eds. (2002). The Internet in Everyday Life. New York, Blackwell.
And finally, the original sources:
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory And Research for The Sociology of Education. J. G. Richardson. New York, Greenwood: 248.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York, Pantheon Books.
Categories: Blog · bourdieu · design · facebook · goffman · home · interaction design · market research · social capital · social media · social networks · sociology · technology design · user experience
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Hey Sam,
Thanks so much for coming down! I think you got us all thinking about how we can strengthen our understanding of the ’social’. So much great info to digest!
Kelly
Thanks, Kelly! It was great to meet you too!
Hi Sam,
I signed up for the breakfast, but had to cancel at the last minute. People have told me it was the best one so far! So I’m trying to catch up and I will now be an avid reader of your blog (love it). With every communications plan, campaign or website I begin with trying to understand the User Experience and go from there. Your insights will help me a lot.
I will check out the first book you mentioned above. Do you have a few more you would recommend (that were published recently). Or eBooks and other online sources?
On Amazon, I saw a few titles. Have you (or your colleagues) heard of them and do you have any thoughts?
The Elements of the User Experience – Jesse James Garrett
Designing for Interaction – Dan Saffer
Designing Interactions – Bill Moggridge
Thank you very much,
Colleen
Hi Colleen, well you’ve definitely hit some of the big names. I recommend them all, actually. I would also encourage that you read something crazy, like The Question Concerning Technology and other essays by Heidegger. Or On The Internet by Hubert Dreyfuss. They don’t at first seem relevant, but I guarantee they will a) blow your mind and b) inspire you! Too bad you missed it! Maybe next time.