<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Brand as A Self: Web Design as Impression Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copernicusconsulting.net/the-brand-as-a-self-web-design-as-impression-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/the-brand-as-a-self-web-design-as-impression-management/</link>
	<description>Design Research and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sladner</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/the-brand-as-a-self-web-design-as-impression-management/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>sladner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Interesting problem, Nick. I think what you&#039;re describing is a typical design conundrum. On the one hand, you need to use dynamic designs. On the other, you need usability.

These two are not mutually exclusive; many flashy sites do actually have robust usability as well.

Usability should &quot;win out&quot; if you put them head to head, if there is a mission-critical process, e.g., a checkout, registration, sign-up, or process.

I would recommend reading some of the content on boxes and arrows on Flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting problem, Nick. I think what you&#8217;re describing is a typical design conundrum. On the one hand, you need to use dynamic designs. On the other, you need usability.</p>
<p>These two are not mutually exclusive; many flashy sites do actually have robust usability as well.</p>
<p>Usability should &#8220;win out&#8221; if you put them head to head, if there is a mission-critical process, e.g., a checkout, registration, sign-up, or process.</p>
<p>I would recommend reading some of the content on boxes and arrows on Flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/the-brand-as-a-self-web-design-as-impression-management/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Hi!  I just discovered your blog - great content!

Regarding &quot;props&quot;: this introduces an interesting tension between usability and impressions. The segment I&#039;m targeting expects to see very dynamic, &quot;Flash-y&quot; sites. However they also have notoriously short attention spans and are just a click away from abandoning my site if they can&#039;t accomplish what they want or are forced to wait too long. Does usability win out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!  I just discovered your blog &#8211; great content!</p>
<p>Regarding &#8220;props&#8221;: this introduces an interesting tension between usability and impressions. The segment I&#8217;m targeting expects to see very dynamic, &#8220;Flash-y&#8221; sites. However they also have notoriously short attention spans and are just a click away from abandoning my site if they can&#8217;t accomplish what they want or are forced to wait too long. Does usability win out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

