<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualitative versus quantitative research, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Design Research and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OKUMU-RINGA PATRICK ALOY</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>OKUMU-RINGA PATRICK ALOY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-718</guid>
		<description>I have read this article and have made good use of it in my discussion with course=mates in my PhD Public Policy class year 3.

Can you give more articles on the various aspects of research designs.

Okumu-Ringa P.A. /okumuringa@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read this article and have made good use of it in my discussion with course=mates in my PhD Public Policy class year 3.</p>
<p>Can you give more articles on the various aspects of research designs.</p>
<p>Okumu-Ringa P.A. /okumuringa@yahoo.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imtiaz Manzar</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Imtiaz Manzar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Would appreciate more compartive studies regarding Qual versus Quant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would appreciate more compartive studies regarding Qual versus Quant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research &#124; Michael Roller</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research &#124; Michael Roller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-715</guid>
		<description>[...] techniques, but Sam Ladner has given great definitions to these two types of design research on his blog. The qualitative process is iterative with the going back and forth from data to sense-making or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] techniques, but Sam Ladner has given great definitions to these two types of design research on his blog. The qualitative process is iterative with the going back and forth from data to sense-making or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stein Communications The Scoop &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Research Resource</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein Communications The Scoop &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Research Resource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-714</guid>
		<description>[...] qualitative and quantitative research on her blog, Design Research, and has added a nice, succinct post that gets at the fundamental benefits of qualitative research, viz. that it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] qualitative and quantitative research on her blog, Design Research, and has added a nice, succinct post that gets at the fundamental benefits of qualitative research, viz. that it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sladner</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>sladner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Very true, Harry.

I particularly agree about when to do qual and quant research &lt;a href=&quot;http://designresearch.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/when-to-do-qualitative-and-qualitative-research/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(see my other post regarding that). &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, Harry.</p>
<p>I particularly agree about when to do qual and quant research <a href="http://designresearch.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/when-to-do-qualitative-and-qualitative-research/" rel="nofollow">(see my other post regarding that). </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/qualitative-versus-quantitative-research-part-ii/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Hi Sam, nice post. As a user-centred design practicioner, there&#039;s a couple of things I&#039;d add to your great summary.

Firstly, qual and quant are usually brought in at different stages of the design process. When you have no product to test yet, or when you only have a sheet of vague requirement specs, qual is the only way to go. Later on, once the product has taken shape, you move into the business of nailing down the finer details and optimising your design decisions. These two different stages are often refered to formative (early on) and summative (later on) evaluation.

Today, with web-based products &amp; services, quantiative research is very popular for live products because once they are out there, it&#039;s trivial to collect behavioural data and to compare the effects of design changes using before/after, A/B or multivariate testing. In this context, quantitative research is much cheaper than qualtiative research - there&#039;s no recruitment cost and it&#039;s easy to get high volumes of users. Conversely, with face to face research, quantitative is a lot more expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sam, nice post. As a user-centred design practicioner, there&#8217;s a couple of things I&#8217;d add to your great summary.</p>
<p>Firstly, qual and quant are usually brought in at different stages of the design process. When you have no product to test yet, or when you only have a sheet of vague requirement specs, qual is the only way to go. Later on, once the product has taken shape, you move into the business of nailing down the finer details and optimising your design decisions. These two different stages are often refered to formative (early on) and summative (later on) evaluation.</p>
<p>Today, with web-based products &amp; services, quantiative research is very popular for live products because once they are out there, it&#8217;s trivial to collect behavioural data and to compare the effects of design changes using before/after, A/B or multivariate testing. In this context, quantitative research is much cheaper than qualtiative research &#8211; there&#8217;s no recruitment cost and it&#8217;s easy to get high volumes of users. Conversely, with face to face research, quantitative is a lot more expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

