<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing a design-thinking organization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/</link>
	<description>Design Research and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ladner</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ladner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d recommend Roger Martin&#039;s The Design of Business for your company&#039;s executives. They&#039;re likely unfamiliar with abductive logic and Martin does an excellent job of explaining how design thinking&#039;s logic is different that typical deductive, business logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d recommend Roger Martin&#8217;s The Design of Business for your company&#8217;s executives. They&#8217;re likely unfamiliar with abductive logic and Martin does an excellent job of explaining how design thinking&#8217;s logic is different that typical deductive, business logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morales</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>Morales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>The company I work for is a steel manufacturer and I would like to know more on how to apply design thinking and innovation strategies to the company. Any suggestions on books, websites or study programs for our executives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company I work for is a steel manufacturer and I would like to know more on how to apply design thinking and innovation strategies to the company. Any suggestions on books, websites or study programs for our executives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resolutions 2011: 10 Things U need to know about design &#171; Fredzimny&#39;s CCCCC&#39;s</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Resolutions 2011: 10 Things U need to know about design &#171; Fredzimny&#39;s CCCCC&#39;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>[...] How Organizations Can Embrace Design Thinking (copernicusconsulting.net) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Organizations Can Embrace Design Thinking (copernicusconsulting.net) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; Adaptive Path &#187; Signposts for the week ending June 4, 2010</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; Adaptive Path &#187; Signposts for the week ending June 4, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>[...] Some excellent thoughts on design thinking and challenges organizations face when trying to embrace it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some excellent thoughts on design thinking and challenges organizations face when trying to embrace it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>I realize I started with a &#039;play&#039; theme and forgot to mention a critical read in that area: &quot;Play&quot; by Stuart Brown. I&#039;m going back and re-reading it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize I started with a &#8216;play&#8217; theme and forgot to mention a critical read in that area: &#8220;Play&#8221; by Stuart Brown. I&#8217;m going back and re-reading it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotkapchen</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotkapchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>I sometimes wish that we each could do a mind-meld across these waves so there would be oh-so-far-less to share and explain...but, alas. Thanks Sam, for synthesizing and adding your own spin to some great perspectives and considerations.

As I read it something circled back to remind me -- we can slice and dice culture all we want. In the end, there&#039;s a simple test: is play tolerated and even encouraged? The classic real-life example of this is Zappos: http://twurl.nl/z74spu (be sure to check out at least one of the videos).

In reviewing two of the books written by leading voices on the topic, I too noted that there were key issues that were missed http://totalexperience.corante.com/archives/2010/02/28/design_thinking_in_stereo_martin_and_brown.php

Neither author sufficiently addressed:
1. The design question: At some point, after all assumptions have been questioned, you have to determine if you&#039;re asking the &#039;right&#039; question. Clearly cultures that are not willing to challenge the &#039;status quo&#039; will never get to the &#039;right&#039; question. The conditions required for shared cultures that would allow for such behaviors is deeply addressed in the book &quot;Theory U&quot;.
2. Finding and embracing failure: Cultures that seek to portray perfection are not comfortable looking for failures as &#039;food for learning&#039; (there&#039;s a whole other conversation to be had around the significance of a &#039;learning culture&#039; as purported by Peter Senge, see esp. &quot;The Dance of Change&quot;).
3.Embracing dichotomies: Design is about making choices, about accommodating constraints and deciding how to address them. Many cultures are &quot;Black and White&quot; -- such cultures miss the variety possible in shades of grey -- embracing the black and white at the same time (look for readings on &quot;paradox&quot; especially Charles Handy&#039;s &quot;The Age of Paradox&quot;)

Already part of my Design Thinking approach is &#039;honoring reality&#039; -- it&#039;s the part that comes after the &#039;appreciative inquiry&#039; (which is part of both the research and discovery phases of Design Thinking). This and other perspectives required for successful Design Thinking are fed by all of the readings above and more. Particularly when the focus of the Design Thinking is on redesigning the organization itself, another book to add to the list is Russell Ackoff&#039;s &quot;Re-Creating the Corporation&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes wish that we each could do a mind-meld across these waves so there would be oh-so-far-less to share and explain&#8230;but, alas. Thanks Sam, for synthesizing and adding your own spin to some great perspectives and considerations.</p>
<p>As I read it something circled back to remind me &#8212; we can slice and dice culture all we want. In the end, there&#8217;s a simple test: is play tolerated and even encouraged? The classic real-life example of this is Zappos: <a href="http://twurl.nl/z74spu" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.nl/z74spu</a> (be sure to check out at least one of the videos).</p>
<p>In reviewing two of the books written by leading voices on the topic, I too noted that there were key issues that were missed <a href="http://totalexperience.corante.com/archives/2010/02/28/design_thinking_in_stereo_martin_and_brown.php" rel="nofollow">http://totalexperience.corante.com/archives/2010/02/28/design_thinking_in_stereo_martin_and_brown.php</a></p>
<p>Neither author sufficiently addressed:<br />
1. The design question: At some point, after all assumptions have been questioned, you have to determine if you&#8217;re asking the &#8216;right&#8217; question. Clearly cultures that are not willing to challenge the &#8217;status quo&#8217; will never get to the &#8216;right&#8217; question. The conditions required for shared cultures that would allow for such behaviors is deeply addressed in the book &#8220;Theory U&#8221;.<br />
2. Finding and embracing failure: Cultures that seek to portray perfection are not comfortable looking for failures as &#8216;food for learning&#8217; (there&#8217;s a whole other conversation to be had around the significance of a &#8216;learning culture&#8217; as purported by Peter Senge, see esp. &#8220;The Dance of Change&#8221;).<br />
3.Embracing dichotomies: Design is about making choices, about accommodating constraints and deciding how to address them. Many cultures are &#8220;Black and White&#8221; &#8212; such cultures miss the variety possible in shades of grey &#8212; embracing the black and white at the same time (look for readings on &#8220;paradox&#8221; especially Charles Handy&#8217;s &#8220;The Age of Paradox&#8221;)</p>
<p>Already part of my Design Thinking approach is &#8216;honoring reality&#8217; &#8212; it&#8217;s the part that comes after the &#8216;appreciative inquiry&#8217; (which is part of both the research and discovery phases of Design Thinking). This and other perspectives required for successful Design Thinking are fed by all of the readings above and more. Particularly when the focus of the Design Thinking is on redesigning the organization itself, another book to add to the list is Russell Ackoff&#8217;s &#8220;Re-Creating the Corporation&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ladner</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ladner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 23:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrea,
Thanks for the thoughtful comment! Yes, I have been looking at Appreciative Inquiry myself and I agree, it&#039;s a great place to start. I haven&#039;t had a chance to use it yet but I plan to. I hope more design thinking projects start with your point of view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrea,<br />
Thanks for the thoughtful comment! Yes, I have been looking at Appreciative Inquiry myself and I agree, it&#8217;s a great place to start. I haven&#8217;t had a chance to use it yet but I plan to. I hope more design thinking projects start with your point of view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Learned</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Learned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding the sociological lens to the discussion!  There have been so many books and articles on design-thinking, why we need it, why it&#039;s so hip, who the &quot;rock stars&quot; are and so on...  The substance that others need to really transform their organizations is not there.  Instead we find the substance in the unsexy, academic-seeming study of values orientation in human beings.  How do people in a particular organization think now, and why?  Knowing that, how can we persuade those people toward a more design-oriented way of thinking?  It&#039;s the same thing I study with regard to engaging both organizations and consumers (citizens!) in sustainability.  Start with where people are/their current values - and not where we wish they were.  One other thing - I&#039;ve been impressed by how the concept of Appreciative Inquiry can be used in almost any organizational change situation.  Appreciate what is already good and you&#039;ll discover where more good can be found from there.  Here&#039;s the wikipedia link to that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciative_inquiry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding the sociological lens to the discussion!  There have been so many books and articles on design-thinking, why we need it, why it&#8217;s so hip, who the &#8220;rock stars&#8221; are and so on&#8230;  The substance that others need to really transform their organizations is not there.  Instead we find the substance in the unsexy, academic-seeming study of values orientation in human beings.  How do people in a particular organization think now, and why?  Knowing that, how can we persuade those people toward a more design-oriented way of thinking?  It&#8217;s the same thing I study with regard to engaging both organizations and consumers (citizens!) in sustainability.  Start with where people are/their current values &#8211; and not where we wish they were.  One other thing &#8211; I&#8217;ve been impressed by how the concept of Appreciative Inquiry can be used in almost any organizational change situation.  Appreciate what is already good and you&#8217;ll discover where more good can be found from there.  Here&#8217;s the wikipedia link to that: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciative_inquiry" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciative_inquiry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamin Hegeman</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamin Hegeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>From Martin to Booger, brilliant. Good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Martin to Booger, brilliant. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embrace &#8220;Design Thinking&#8221; &#171; Ideas About Content</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/organizations-embrace-design-thinking/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Embrace &#8220;Design Thinking&#8221; &#171; Ideas About Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://copernicusconsulting.net/?p=491#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>[...] Organizations Embrace Design Thinking [ Copernicus Consulting ] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Organizations Embrace Design Thinking [ Copernicus Consulting ] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

