<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#039;t think privacy, think identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/</link>
	<description>Design Research and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ladner</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Ladner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>Oh no, I completely agree you should be able to collate -- if you want, and in the way you want it. That serendipitous experience you describe is absolutely one of the delightful things about social networks. That said, however, you need to think like you&#039;re designing a person, not a system. So construct it to avoid embarrassment, and allow users to either know or at least guess what embarrassment is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, I completely agree you should be able to collate &#8212; if you want, and in the way you want it. That serendipitous experience you describe is absolutely one of the delightful things about social networks. That said, however, you need to think like you&#8217;re designing a person, not a system. So construct it to avoid embarrassment, and allow users to either know or at least guess what embarrassment is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Flaschner</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Flaschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>Interesting points Sam. I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m with you on reducing ability to collate social information. I suppose this should be a feature that the individual chooses to allow/disallow. But without it, we&#039;d give up some of the discoverability and wonder that makes Twitter et al (occasionally) magical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points Sam. I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m with you on reducing ability to collate social information. I suppose this should be a feature that the individual chooses to allow/disallow. But without it, we&#8217;d give up some of the discoverability and wonder that makes Twitter et al (occasionally) magical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A note to the Y: Please use my data for good, not evil &#171; It happens here: Consumer-centric Innovation in Charlotte and beyond</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>A note to the Y: Please use my data for good, not evil &#171; It happens here: Consumer-centric Innovation in Charlotte and beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-732</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quest to solve this problem using Open ID.  Design researcher Sam Ladner reframes the conversation away from privacy towards allowing users greater control over their own (potentially stigmatizing) identities.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exde</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>exde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-731</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I&#8217;m very interested in the emotional experiences created when humans interact with information, and I&#8217;ve been struggling with balancing privacy and social desires using social media&#8217;s limited tools. Your identity management framework is illuminating, thank you!</p>
<p>Designers, businesses, and users should also be aware of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s Fair Information Practice Principles. I posted further info and comments about this at <a href="http://exde.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/social-identity-design/" rel="nofollow">http://exde.wordpress.com/2009/02/17/social-identity-design/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social identity design &#171; exde</title>
		<link>http://copernicusconsulting.net/dont-think-privacy-think-identity/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>social identity design &#171; exde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designresearch.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-730</guid>
		<description>[...] identity&#160;design Sam Ladner&#8217;s &#8220;Don&#8217;t think privacy, think identity&#8221; sheds light on a gray area, framing the digital privacy question in terms of identity management. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] identity&nbsp;design Sam Ladner&#8217;s &#8220;Don&#8217;t think privacy, think identity&#8221; sheds light on a gray area, framing the digital privacy question in terms of identity management. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

